![]()
R.I.P royallypwned
Robert Griffin III @RGIII
Your positive vibes and prayers worked people!!!! To God be the Glory!
Sprain only guys, thank god. Now we can fully enjoy this win!
Hail!
Let him heal and buckle up for the last three games.
"Washington strolled to the NFC championship, outscoring their two playoff opponents by a combined total of 48 points. Their domination was more than impressive, it was historic. The 1991 Redskins boasted the largest average margin of victory among all Super Bowl champions."
--- America's Game
Never mind, beat me to it!
Last edited by terpskins10; December-9th-2012 at 06:42 PM.
Yeah, maybe this will happen, just to let him rest as long as possible and only play if possible. I know he's a warrior and wants to be there for the team, but playing 10-15 years for the team sounds good to me!
Ah okay, well then here's to the Packers next weekend!
Last edited by PigskinRedskin; December-9th-2012 at 06:43 PM.
Thank God. Now I can finally enjoy the W. HTTR
I see what you are saying, and I can even admit that RG3's playing style might increase the chance of his getting injured (like Vick or McNabb always being hurt for example), but I still think it would be a mistake to limit his game out of fear of injury. Regardless of the risk, I cannot imagine handcuffing RG3 by taking his speed and elusiveness out of the game plan.
Also, this idea that a running quarterback cannot (or is unlikely to) have a long and successful career is simply false.
-John Elway played 15 years (774 rushing attempts).
-Fran Tarkenton played 17 years (675 rushing attempts).
-Steve Young played 12 years (722 rushing attempts).
-Heck, even McNabb played 12 years (616 attempts).
Anyway I think Elway, Young, and Tarkenton are good counter-examples to the "running QBs are doomed to short careers" argument.
Let RG3 be RG3 please. Do not limit him out of fear!
Last edited by s0crates; December-9th-2012 at 06:46 PM.
The press asked a Redskins executive about the salary cap penalty and the executive responded, "Ask John Mara." So the press asked Mara and he said, “What they did was in violation of the spirit of the salary cap. "
Oh I see now, even though there was no actual salary cap in 2010 according to the CBA, the "spirit" of the salary cap still existed. Thanks for clearing that up Mara.
What a terrible thing to say after such good news.
Does this mean we are fully in the clear for him to get make it back by the end of the season? The fact that they say no "significant" ligament damage makes me wonder what was meant by that. I'm not a health major so I'm sorry if its obvious.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)