+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 159

Thread: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

  1. #46
    The Rookie
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern Arizona
    Age
    49
    Posts
    1,048

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    Depends on where the Free Agent quality is. If it is at WR then yes. And yes at this point it does look like of the Free Agents available more bang for the buck can be had at WR but every year there are some unexpected players available. But right now I'd try to get Dwayne Bowe.

  2. #47

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    Quote Originally Posted by nonniey View Post
    Depends on where the Free Agent quality is. If it is at WR then yes. And yes at this point it does look like of the Free Agents available more bang for the buck can be had at WR but every year there are some unexpected players available. But right now I'd try to get Dwayne Bowe.
    Bowe would be nice, great hands but undisciplined route runner which does not fit a new QB well.
    Steve-O "Crank up that Deisel"

  3. #48
    The Special Teams Ace
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Virginia Beach
    Age
    27
    Posts
    385

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    I think our receivers were OK, offense is 5th in the leage.

    Defense is 28th...

    Id like us to put more of our resources there.... 3 to 5 split..

  4. #49

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    Quote Originally Posted by bops View Post
    no doubt no doubt

    the thought of adding greg jennings makes me drool tho :P
    Vinny would think so too

  5. #50
    The Waterboy
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Center(Sinner), TX
    Age
    40
    Posts
    79

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    Mike Wallace would be a coup, however, that's pipe-dreamin' it. Draft a RT, sign a couple DBs and shore up the D. Boom.

    Or, the ZBS lends to later round finds with OL, draft a couple of safeties and depth for the front 7 and OL.

  6. #51
    No New Threads
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, ca
    Posts
    1,314

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    Who would mesh well with our personnel and system?

  7. #52

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    ^I think Cribbs would be a great addition because he can return KOs also.

    We should add another receiver, but we have a bigger need a playmaker in our secondary, a nose tackle, or RT. Since theres more free agent WR talent this year, we should add a mid-card to make our offense even more threatening. I can't wait to have Fred Davis back too.
    Last edited by ktak240; December-14th-2012 at 12:22 AM.

  8. #53
    The Dirtbags skinny21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Round Rock, TX via Cabin John, MD
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,558

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    If you look at the top issues this team needs to address, they'd be: keeping Griffin healthy; improving our pass rush, and limiting the opponent's passing game (at least the big plays). I read that as us needing o-line help, a pass rusher, safeties (and probably corners) and maybe a 3rd down back... not so much a stud wr (not that that'd hurt).

    In terms of improving our passing game, if Davis comes back (healthy) for us, I think he'll fit the bill. Remember, Davis and Garçon haven't really been on the field together. Seeing Davis' blocking improve so greatly makes him an even bigger loss than his quality production indicates.

    This is already a very dangerous offense, add a pass-catching back and a RT and this offense would be that much harder to stop/defend. Heck, we're easily a top 10 offense in all the stats that really matter, so a massive (read: costly) upgrade is less necessary.

    Factor in the concerns with T. Jackson (and C. Griffin), Orakpo/Merriweather/Helu/Bernstine's health, Fletcher's age, Hall's contract, Davis' status and the poor play of M. Williams, and it pretty easy to ignore our wr group.

    Long story short, as others have said it would be nice, but it's not one of our top priorities. Also, we're a bit short on cash since the robbery.

  9. #54
    The Bruiser Bacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Valparaiso, IN
    Age
    22
    Posts
    6,077

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    Why do they have to be big name? Can't they just be good?

  10. #55

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    I think the best ones like Cruz, Amendola, Jennings, etc... will be re-signed by their teams. I'd rather try to sign Jairius Byrd, but I also doubt the Bills will let him hit free agency like that.
    Only dead fishes follow the stream. "Only when the last tree has died, the last river has been poisoned, and the last fish has been caught, we will realize that we can't eat money."

  11. #56
    The Role Player afkidd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Eglin, FL
    Age
    28
    Posts
    945

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    this has probably been said before, but we have the 5th rated offense based on yards and 7th on points. this is basically without davis and garcon on the field at the same time. we have a horrible defense even though they've had stretches of being ok lately. let's focus on d.

  12. #57
    The Role Player
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    S.E. PA
    Age
    52
    Posts
    916

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    Yes, for the secondary.

  13. #58
    The Cover Corner Gamebreaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Upper Marlboro, Maryland
    Age
    32
    Posts
    5,025

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    I think they should go bargain hunting. Save the cap space for positions that are hurting more. Send offers to Amendola, who would thrive in this system but would be cheaper than Welker, and give Ted Ginn Jr. a second chance to save his career. Top candidates like Dwayne Bowe, Welker, and Greg Jennings will cost too much when we need a whole new secondary.

  14. #59
    Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Back in the old Country unitil the New Year- darn frustrating Government B/S.
    Age
    38
    Posts
    16,084

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    John Mara has already answered your question.

    We have too many more pressing needs, and too little cap space to work with, to even contemplate this in 2013. We roll with what we have, and anyone that fits that's cheap and upgrades next year. Garcon's a bona fide #1, and it's another year of development for the likes of Hank and Aldrick.

    Hail.

  15. #60
    Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    A little town called none of your G-D business!
    Age
    31
    Posts
    13,295

    Default Re: Should the Redskins Sign a big name receiver in the Off Season?

    Don't they already have a big name receiver in Garcon?
    Jim Haslett is a horrible coach.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Redskins sign former Ravens wide receiver.....
    By inmate running the asylum in forum The Stadium
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: January-14th-2006, 10:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts