Lets set aside the example of the Holocaust - its a frankly ridiculous parallel to try to make.
Can you find any example of 'large scale burglary, property destruction, ineffective law enforcement' in say the last 50 years in a Western Democracy in these circumstances? There have been a few earthquakes and other natural disasters in Europe (where there is minimal gun ownership) the last I can think of being in Italy. Lots of property damage, medical and emergency services stretched to breaking point - but no break down I law and order or large scale looting.
The idea that you need an armed population in the US to mitigate against a state of anarchy locally or nationally as a justification for the scale of gun ownership in the US or to legitimize the continued relevance of the second amendment is, to me, a really weak argument.






We just keep going around in circles. The majority here obviously don't agree with me, and that's ok. We have the right to disagree with each other. On any other topic I'm confident that most of us would find we have many things in common.

