+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 158

Thread: Rob Jackson's Worth

  1. #16
    The Rookie JMUSkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    In sight of the Blue Ridge
    Age
    32
    Posts
    1,058

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Don't we already have another thread with 1,234,343,343,445,555,334 posts on this topic? I say we hold on to this guy... if he's a character player he'll want to sign back on with this team as well

  2. #17
    The Free Agent Hiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,689

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Quote Originally Posted by TheLongshot View Post
    And the overvaluing of Jackson has begun.

    Hey, I like the guy and I think he's done a good job filling in for Orakpo. But Orakpo is what makes our pass rush go. Right now, we HAVE to blitz to have a conistent pass rush, and good teams will find a way to beat that, particularly with the relatively weak secondary we have.
    I don't see anyone here suggesting that we should get rid of Orakpo in order to keep Jackson.

    But overvaluing? In his first year as a starter (in 14 games), Jackson has 4 picks and 7 pass deflections. Orakpo's ability as a pass rusher aside, he's been mediocre as a coverage linebacker. Coverage ability in a linebacker is NOT something to be taken lightly. We need to keep Jackson here, and maximize our defense's potential by using him, Kerrigan and Orakpo all together.

    Formerly known as Hero21. Click for my best memory of royallypwned

  3. #18
    The Deep Threat The Full Monty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    The Bronx
    Age
    29
    Posts
    4,221

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Pay the man! This is a home-grown talent that HAS to be rewarded. This sends a message not only to him but to the rest of the team.
    Will over skill.

  4. #19
    The Starter dreamshatterer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Age
    30
    Posts
    2,563

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    I wonder if he can slide into the middle when Fletch retries. His coverage abaility is ideal for ILB in a 3-4

  5. #20
    The Dirtbags Murphs56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    Age
    26
    Posts
    1,624

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Jackson has done an admirable job filling in for Orakpo but if you think he's better, you're nuts. Orakpo would've had over double digit sacks this year and that probably means Kerrigan would have too... That much maligned secondary wouldn't have given up all those yards either because of the pass rush.
    Last edited by Murphs56; December-31st-2012 at 01:32 PM.

  6. #21

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Quote Originally Posted by dreamshatterer View Post
    I wonder if he can slide into the middle when Fletch retries. His coverage abaility is ideal for ILB in a 3-4
    This is what I've been saying all year. If anything he shouldn't be competing with Orakpo, but being groomed as a replacement for Fletcher. I mean right now itz Zo splitting time with Fletcher, but the question becomes is Jackson better at that spot than Zo? I also wonder if I'd rather have Jackson covering the TEs than Fletcher? Its a different dynamic than covering RBs, but its something to consider.
    “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”.

    "There are no stupid people just stupid posts"

    Interested in learning about math, probability, or Computer Science and their connections to the real world? Learn more at my site: http://www.learninglover.com, or visit me on Twitter: @MindAfterMath

    A recent blog post : The Risk of Competition

  7. #22
    No New Threads
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    winchester, va
    Age
    37
    Posts
    523

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Quote Originally Posted by DC9 View Post
    He is a starting OLB.

    He is not a back up.

    Orakpo is a pass rusher. Jackson is a Linebacker. He needs to be paid. I say we give him a 3 year $6 to $7 mil range. Let Golston walk and give him that money. We can make it work.

    Couldn't have said it any better. Jackson in your first and down LB as he is far better in run/pass coverage. Orakpo is your sack guy. Gotta keep Rob Jackson on this roster. He has earned it.


    EDIT: If last night didn't prove to the Orakpo homers that Rob Jackson is a better football player, I'm moving on from the conversation. The kid is a baller and he makes big plays on the big stage where Orakpo dissappears. End of discussion for me.


    ---------- Post added December-31st-2012 at 07:40 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Murphs56 View Post
    Jackson has done an admirable job filling in for Orakpo but if you think he's better, you're nuts. Orakpo would've had over double digit sacks this year and that probably means Kerrigan would have too... That much maligned secondary wouldn't have given up all those yards either because of the pass rush.
    Sacks alone don't make you the better overall player. I agree that Orakpo is better at getting to the QB, but your nuts if you think Orakpo is better as a pure LB in defending the run and dropping back into coverage. In fact, IMO, Orakpo is a liability when asked to do anything besides rush the QB

  8. #23
    The Playmaker moondog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pensacola
    Age
    24
    Posts
    3,174

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Quote Originally Posted by TheLongshot View Post
    And the overvaluing of Jackson has begun.

    Hey, I like the guy and I think he's done a good job filling in for Orakpo. But Orakpo is what makes our pass rush go. Right now, we HAVE to blitz to have a conistent pass rush, and good teams will find a way to beat that, particularly with the relatively weak secondary we have.

    As for the "Well, he can cover", do you think Cowboys fans worry if Ware can cover? To be honest, you want your pass rushers to rush the passer most of the time.

    I'd love to bring back Jackson. At the same time, have a realistic view as to how he fits into this team and what is value is to this team. We've gotten in trouble in the past for overvaluing some players (and yes, undervaluing some others.)
    100% on your side man but I'm getting so tired as is the other side of trying to hash this thing out. Clearly it just is what it is at this point and some people are so sold on their opinion they won't hear anything but what they want to hear. Hopefully we can hold on to Jackson but I would not be surprised if he went elsewhere for a full time starting gig. And of course we're kind of assuming Rak can come back healthy, which I'm really hoping he can.

  9. #24
    The Camp Fodder
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Bronx, NY
    Posts
    142

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Both Orakpo and Jackson should be kept on this team. I'd like to see Haslett be creative with their usage next season when Orakpo is back. There's nothing wrong with having a lot of pass rushers, the Steelers and Giants have done this for years. Maybe play Jackson at ILB or use Orakpo mostly just on passing downs, things like that.

    ---------- Post added December-31st-2012 at 02:43 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by bigevhfan View Post


    ---------- Post added December-31st-2012 at 07:40 PM ----------



    Sacks alone don't make you the better overall player. I agree that Orakpo is better at getting to the QB, but your nuts if you think Orakpo is better as a pure LB in defending the run and dropping back into coverage. In fact, IMO, Orakpo is a liability when asked to do anything besides rush the QB
    You're right that Orakpo has done a poor job in coverage and run defense over the past couple of seasons, but I wonder how much of that is reflective upon the scheme he was playing in? Jackson has been asked to do different things than Orakpo.

  10. #25
    The Field Goal Team 2STaylor1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Dover Delaware
    Age
    28
    Posts
    451

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    could rob jackson one day replace fletcher

  11. #26
    The Waterboy
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Silver Spring.
    Age
    18
    Posts
    44

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Any chance he moves to ILB? He certainly looks athletic enough.

  12. #27
    Ring of Fame TheLongshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Burke, VA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    14,710

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Quote Originally Posted by Hiro View Post
    I don't see anyone here suggesting that we should get rid of Orakpo in order to keep Jackson.

    But overvaluing? In his first year as a starter (in 14 games), Jackson has 4 picks and 7 pass deflections. Orakpo's ability as a pass rusher aside, he's been mediocre as a coverage linebacker. Coverage ability in a linebacker is NOT something to be taken lightly. We need to keep Jackson here, and maximize our defense's potential by using him, Kerrigan and Orakpo all together.
    I'm responding to people saying he's a starter. With Kerrigan and Orakpo, there aren't a whole lot of snaps for other players.

    As for pass defense, you don't typically select OLBs in a 3-4 for their pass defense. (which is why they are typically converted DEs.)

    Edit: agree with below that the team could use him, but lets be realistic of how many snaps he'd get with the defense with Orakpo and Kerrigan.
    Last edited by TheLongshot; December-31st-2012 at 01:58 PM.

  13. #28
    The Dirtbags skinny21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Round Rock, TX via Cabin John, MD
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,558

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Quote Originally Posted by moondog View Post
    100% on your side man but I'm getting so tired as is the other side of trying to hash this thing out. Clearly it just is what it is at this point and some people are so sold on their opinion they won't hear anything but what they want to hear. Hopefully we can hold on to Jackson but I would not be surprised if he went elsewhere for a full time starting gig. And of course we're kind of assuming Rak can come back healthy, which I'm really hoping he can.
    Yeah, history has shown we need a capable a 3rd OLB. Don't wanna have to use a draft pick and definitely don't wanna let Jackson walk and be forced to pursue a free agent to replace him.

    If I recall correctly, Orakpo gets more hurries than most other rushers, whereas Jackson is excellent in coverage. We could really use both going forward.

    Not sure about Jackson in the middle covering tight ends. Seems like most of his plays have been in short zone or covering the Rb in the flat. Big difference compared with running down the field with big, athletic TEs.

  14. #29
    The Bruiser Bacon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Valparaiso, IN
    Age
    22
    Posts
    6,077

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    We have 3 very good OLBs here with Fletch and Riley handling things nicely in the middle. I don't know why we wouldn't want to maintain that in 2013. We need to get pressure without blitzing and Rak is instrumental to that, so I don't understand how he has been "replaced" by a coverage LB. That's ridiculous.

    Our DL is average and the secondary is lousy/occasionally serviceable. There are plenty of pieces that needed to be added and removed. Keep the very solid core we have in between.
    Last edited by Bacon; December-31st-2012 at 01:54 PM.

  15. #30
    Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Cross Junction, Virginia
    Age
    49
    Posts
    10,140

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Quote Originally Posted by Murphs56 View Post
    Jackson has done an admirable job filling in for Orakpo but if you think he's better, you're nuts. Orakpo would've had over double digit sacks this year and that probably means Kerrigan would have too... That much maligned secondary wouldn't have given up all those yards either because of the pass rush.
    Redskins are missing at least 18 sacks for about 118 yards plus another 82 due directly to the increase in sacks. Further, while the additional yards prevented because of the lower accuracy due to this increased pressure is not exact, I'd bet that completion % and yards per completion would be down. Finally, since some of those completions allowed drives to continue, I would also guess that the total number of plays allowed would also be fewer further reducing total yards. We did see, however, that once we adjusted our schemes appropriately and the tackling improved, a lot of the YAC that other team were getting early in the season did seem to fall.
    A bad plan well executed may work. A good plan badly executed will always fail.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: July-21st-2010, 10:46 PM
  2. Replies: 24
    Last Post: July-1st-2010, 02:33 PM
  3. Replies: 18
    Last Post: July-13th-2009, 10:34 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts