+ Reply to Thread
Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11
Results 151 to 158 of 158

Thread: Rob Jackson's Worth

  1. #151
    The Special Teams Ace Houston2Taylor2Landry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Berkeley Springs, West Virginia
    Age
    18
    Posts
    378

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Quote Originally Posted by Hitman21ST View Post
    Sub Jackson in for Riley or Fletcher on passing downs. Jackson is good in coverage, so we take our weakest coverage ILB (Riley) and get Jackson in there. Rak and Kerrigan rushing with Jackson and Fletcher covering.
    If we could somehow turn Jax into a ILB, that would be amazing. Would be amazing depth. Zo and Jax could play in and out. Still got Robinson, too.
    The King stay the King.

  2. #152
    The Rookie shakinaiken's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Centreville VA
    Age
    24
    Posts
    1,455

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Quote Originally Posted by Mahons21 View Post
    I think you keep both of them. Jackson in base 34, at OLB, and Rak as a situational pass rusher playing all across the front four in our nickel sets.
    you guys are out of your mind. rob Jackson has played well in Orakpo's absence- perhaps even exceeding expectations- but Orakpo is the teams best outside linebacker, and you don't play your best OLB in strictly nickel packages. nothing I've seen this year from rob Jackson dissuades my opinion.

  3. #153
    The Free Agent
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    4,794

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky52Mc View Post
    LOL ....orakpo as a situational pass rusher?
    Yes.

    There's too many ways to play the 3-4 while keeping Riley, Fletcher, Kerrigan, Orakpo, and Jackson on the field all at the same time. If anyone can stay fresh its Jackson. He's awesome but Orakpo would be getting paid way too much.
    I can't even tell what you're trying to say here outside of the last sentence. And no he wouldn't be getting paid too much as a situational pass-rusher.

    ---------- Post added January-4th-2013 at 06:39 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by shakinaiken View Post
    you guys are out of your mind. rob Jackson has played well in Orakpo's absence- perhaps even exceeding expectations- but Orakpo is the teams best outside linebacker, and you don't play your best OLB in strictly nickel packages. nothing I've seen this year from rob Jackson dissuades my opinion.
    Rak is the teams best pass-rusher, not the teams best OLB.

    Furthermore, I think you're underestimating just how often teams run nickel packages as the NFL continues to trend towards multiple receiver sets.

    I vision Rak in a smilar role to what Aldon Smith played his rookie year, when he got 14 sacks and to FF.

  4. #154
    The Starter emor09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Age
    22
    Posts
    2,687

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Orakpo can't defend the pass or run anywhere near as well as Jackson can. But Orakpo is a playmaker rushing the passer.


    F.K.A. Staylorfan021

  5. #155

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    I love Rak. I love me some Rob Jackson. They complement each other well. I hope we can keep both.

    This is my opinion only, and it has nothing to do with whether Rak is better, or vice versa, but Rob Jackson is absolutely the prototype of the kind of player that brings me the most satisfaction in terms of watching him succeed. Drafted late, cut, made practice squad, cut...kept putting in work...and boom, now he's an instrumental piece in our climb back to the top of the NFC Beast. He has earned his paycheck, and I couldn't be happier for him. I'm stoked to watch him continue to grow and excel, and hopefully it will be in the B&G. Free Rob Jackson!

  6. #156
    The Rookie
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Age
    25
    Posts
    1,054

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    everyone needs to stop with the get rid of one or the other talk. Fletch ain't going to be around forever. I can see Jackson playing pretty well as an ILB especially the way he has been in coverage. My only concern (and he has improved on this) is him being consistent in run support
    Last edited by steve09ru; January-4th-2013 at 07:14 PM.
    The Hands Will Come

  7. #157

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    I suppose the setup would be:

    Starters:

    Jackson
    Fletcher
    Riley
    Kerrigan

    Pass Rushing downs:
    Orakpo
    Jackson
    Riley
    Kerrigan

    The problem with this is that we've really gone away from the concept of a "pass rushing down" except in obvious situations, and the increased use of no-huddle means that it'll be harder to switch packages in and out.

  8. #158
    The Starter Rocky52Mc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    College Park, MD
    Posts
    2,658

    Default Re: Rob Jackson's Worth

    Quote Originally Posted by Mahons21 View Post
    Yes.


    I can't even tell what you're trying to say here outside of the last sentence. And no he wouldn't be getting paid too much as a situational pass-rusher.

    ---------- Post added January-4th-2013 at 06:39 PM ----------



    Rak is the teams best pass-rusher, not the teams best OLB.

    Furthermore, I think you're underestimating just how often teams run nickel packages as the NFL continues to trend towards multiple receiver sets.

    I vision Rak in a smilar role to what Aldon Smith played his rookie year, when he got 14 sacks and to FF.
    Go up to Orakpo and tell him, we're going to start paying you like a situational pass rusher. And he'll leave the god damn team, that's my point.
    15. Please maintain respectable size signatures within the limitations set herein.

    Maintaining reasonable size signatures minimizes the amount of load time needed to access a given page. Furthermore, it reduces the amount of scrolling required of users perusing threads. Signatures should not exceed 550 pixels in width and 200 pixels in height. These dimensions are not a guideline, they are a rule. It is the standard dimension for the entire signature. Regardless of the quantity of photos posted, the sum area of all the photos must not exceed the stated size limitations. In addition, signatures should not contain any more than 10 lines of text. The sum total of the height (i.e. 200 pixels) INCLUDES text or any combination of images and text.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: July-21st-2010, 10:46 PM
  2. Replies: 24
    Last Post: July-1st-2010, 02:33 PM
  3. Replies: 18
    Last Post: July-13th-2009, 10:34 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts