
Originally Posted by
respectgibbs
I'm so sick of hearing this. You know, players can play effectively with injury. Just because RG3 was off doesn't mean it was necessarily BECAUSE he was hurt. He may have just been off, and well, you know he was going against a great D. It's the ultimate excuse for RG3 when he plays poorly ("oh, he's just injured"). People that wanted RG3 out of the game wanted that because he was INEFFECTIVE while injured, not that he was just injured. If RG3 was throwing perfect passes on his bum knee, nobody would give a **** and love that he was in there scoring points. And he may have had just the same chance of reinjuring it.