
Originally Posted by
smoked
I won't comment on the recovery time for a second ACL reconstruction as compared to a first reconstruction as I don't know. What I do know is that the way his leg buckled going after the loose ball is indicative of an ACL injury. The angle at which his knee "gave way" is nearly identical to the trauma that tore my ACL. I needed complete ACL reconstruction, and I chose an allograft - tissue (tendon) from a cadaver. RG and all high-level athletes almost always use an autograft which would be tissue (tendon) taken from his own body. RG probably already used the middle third of his patellar tendon (of the same knee) in his first ACL reconstruction. If that is the case then he will need to get an autograft from another part of his body such as a hamstring tendon. There is debate as to which one is better. Both are EXCELLENT and BETTER than any allograft. Additionally, the good news about an autograft vs an allograft is that it is a shorter recovery time b/c it incorporates into the body sooner. After all, it's not a foreign "part" being introduced into the body as an allograft from a cadaver is.
There's speculation in this post, but I am preparing myself to learn that his ACL will also be reconstructed along with his LCL - and am preparing for that length of recovery time and not the shorter LCL length. .