I agree, if they didn't install new sod after Kenny Chesney, they probably should have. They did after the U2 concert in 2009, which was after 2 games into the reg season.
I don't think Field turf is the answer, check out my previous posts pointing to research indicating it increases injuries. My opinion is that the sub-par field conditions are a result of a full season of playing on it, combined with 3 games with wet conditions (Colts, Falcons, Ravens). Putting new sod down in December in DC is not a great idea.
---------- Post added January-9th-2013 at 01:04 AM ----------
Yea, I think we're on the same page. My attempt is to try and have a discussion with people and not have people blame the maintenance guys or call for Field Turf. Field Turf is not the answer (I know you're not saying that, but many others are). I would prefer grass as well, but would be open to a hybrid system like PHI, GB and DEN uses if it would reduce injuries. I don't care how it looks, I'm concerned about safety. I'm not convinced that natural grass causes injuries more injuries than artificial surfaces and there is research to support that.
---------- Post added January-9th-2013 at 01:06 AM ----------
The game last night was played in Miami. You can't have a grass field in DC in January after playing all season on it, especially some games in wet conditions look like a grass field in Miami. I don't know of any amount of maintenance you could do to make it look like that. I remember a few years ago, they played the Rose Bowl and a week later they played the National Championship game at the Rose Bowl. They replaced the sod between the 2 games. You can do that in Southern CA in January, I don't think it's possible to do that in DC in January.
---------- Post added January-9th-2013 at 01:09 AM ----------
High Schools use Field Turf because it allows for greater utilization of the field. They can play and practice on it and it doesn't get worn down. Especially in the spring when you have boys/girls lacrosse and boys/girls soccer all playing on the same field. Field Turf is more expensive for high schools compared to natural grass b/c high schools don't normally have the expense of grounds crews to maintain a grass surface. In the pros and college, it's the opposite as usually grass costs much more over the long run due to maintenance expenses.



Reply With Quote
HAIL! 


